Mail Index

• Thread Index

• [agi] Uses of Mind.html tutorial Artificial General Intelligence
  • From: A. T. Murray
• Re: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: Steve Richfield
• RE: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: Derek Zahn
• Re: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• RE: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: Derek Zahn
• RE: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• [agi] Language Comprehension: Archival Memory or ...
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Language Comprehension: Archival Memory or ...
  • From: Mark Waser
• [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• RE: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Peter Voss
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Language Comprehension: Archival Memory or ...
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: wannabe
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Panu Horsmalahti
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Nathan Cravens
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Lukasz Stafiniak
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Nathan Cravens
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Wrong Bloody Document, Folks! [WAS Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Nathan Cravens
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• [agi] Phoenix has Landed
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• [agi] More Phoenix Info...
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• Re: Competitive message routing protocol (was Re: [agi] Deliberative vs Spatial intelligence)
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• [agi] Re: Mark Waser arguing that OpenCog should be recoded in .Net ;-p
  • From: Mark Waser
• Wrong Bloody Document, Folks! [WAS Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers]
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Lukasz Stafiniak
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• [agi] Re: Mark Waser arguing that OpenCog should be recoded in .Net ;-p
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• [agi] Re: Mark Waser arguing that OpenCog should be recoded in .Net ;-p
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Stephen Reed
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• [agi] Design Phase Announce - VRRM project
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Stephen Reed
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: **SPAM** Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More Info Please.. OFFLINE
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Stephen Reed
• Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Goal Driven Systems and AI Dangers [WAS Re: Singularity Outcomes...]
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: BillK
• RE: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Derek Zahn
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: BillK
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: BillK
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• Merging threads was Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Design Phase Announce - VRRM project
  • From: Steve Richfield
• [agi] Re: Merging - or: Multiplicity
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• [agi] Computer Vision May Not Be As Good As Thought
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: Merging threads was Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Stephen Reed
• Re: [agi] Re: Merging - or: Multiplicity
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Computer Vision May Not Be As Good As Thought
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Re: Merging - or: Multiplicity
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: David Hart
• Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mark Waser
• RE: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: Merging threads was Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Re: Merging - or: Multiplicity
  • From: Steve Richfield
• RE: [agi] Re: Merging - or: Multiplicity
  • From: Derek Zahn
• Re: [agi] Re: Merging - or: Multiplicity
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Design Phase Announce - VRRM project
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Re: Merging - or: Multiplicity
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: Merging threads was Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: Merging threads was Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: Merging threads was Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: Merging threads was Re: Code generation was Re: [agi] More Info Please
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] Design Phase Announce - VRRM project
  • From: Steve Richfield
• [agi] "Adaptivity in Hybrid Cognitive Systems" Osnabruck PhD program
  • From: Lukasz Stafiniak
• [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: A. T. Murray
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• [agi] U.S. Plan for 'Thinking Machines' Repository
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• [agi] Oops!
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: Competitive message routing protocol (was Re: [agi] Deliberative vs Spatial intelligence)
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Re: Merging - or: Multiplicity
  • From: Steve Richfield
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] U.S. Plan for 'Thinking Machines' Repository
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] U.S. Plan for 'Thinking Machines' Repository
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] U.S. Plan for 'Thinking Machines' Repository
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] U.S. Plan for 'Thinking Machines' Repository
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] U.S. Plan for 'Thinking Machines' Repository
  • From: Tudor Boloni
• Re: [agi] Compression PLUS a fitness function "motoring" for hypothesized compressibility is intelligence?
  • From: Tudor Boloni
• Re: [agi] U.S. Plan for 'Thinking Machines' Repository
  • From: Bryan Bishop
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Compression PLUS a fitness function "motoring" for hypothesized compressibility is intelligence?
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] U.S. Plan for 'Thinking Machines' Repository
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• RE: [agi] CONSCIOUSNESS AS AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMPUTATION
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] Compression PLUS a fitness function "motoring" for hypothesized compressibility is intelligence?
  • From: Tudor Boloni
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Mike Tintner
• [agi] Computer model reveals how brain represents meaning
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Computer model reveals how brain represents meaning
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] Computer model reveals how brain represents meaning
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Computer model reveals how brain represents meaning
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Computer model reveals how brain represents meaning
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Compression PLUS a fitness function "motoring" for hypothesized compressibility is intelligence?
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Computer model reveals how brain represents meaning
  • From: Mike Tintner
• [agi] Re: Mark Waser arguing that OpenCog should be recoded in .Net ;-p
  • From: Linas Vepstas
• Re : [agi] Re: Mark Waser arguing that OpenCog should be recoded in .Net ;-p
  • From: Bruno Frandemiche
• [agi] Live Forever Machines...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Live Forever Machines...
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Computer model reveals how brain represents meaning
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Live Forever Machines...
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Compression PLUS a fitness function "motoring" for hypothesized compressibility is intelligence?
  • From: Jim Bromer
• [agi] Consciousness is simple
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• [agi] Simplistic Paradigms Are Not Substitutes For Insight Into Conceptual Complexity
  • From: Jim Bromer
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Compression PLUS a fitness function "motoring" for hypothesized compressibility is intelligence?
  • From: Tudor Boloni
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Simplistic Paradigms Are Not Substitutes For Insight Into Conceptual Complexity
  • From: Tudor Boloni
• Re: [agi] Compression PLUS a fitness function "motoring" for hypothesized compressibility is intelligence?
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Simplistic Paradigms Are Not Substitutes For Insight Into Conceptual Complexity
  • From: Jim Bromer
• [agi] Memory as a movie
  • From: Bob Mottram
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] Memory as a movie ;crosspost to ExI
  • From: Gary Miller
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• [agi] Holistic vs Parts Processing
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] CONSCIOUSNESS AS AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMPUTATION
  • From: John G. Rose
• [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• [agi] Uncertainty
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Live Forever Machines...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• [agi] news bit: Is this a unified theory of the brain? Do Bayesian statistics rule the brain?
  • From: David Hart
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Live Forever Machines...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] news bit: Is this a unified theory of the brain? Do Bayesian statistics rule the brain?
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Consciousness is simple
  • From: Nathan Cravens
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] news bit: Is this a unified theory of the brain? Do Bayesian statistics rule the brain?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Live Forever Machines...
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] news bit: Is this a unified theory of the brain? Do Bayesian statistics rule the brain?
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] news bit: Is this a unified theory of the brain? Do Bayesian statistics rule the brain?
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Uncertainty
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: j.k.
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: Jiri Jelinek
• Re: [agi] news bit: Is this a unified theory of the brain? Do Bayesian statistics rule the brain?
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Uncertainty
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Uncertainty
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Uncertainty
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: j.k.
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• [agi] Neurons
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Derek Zahn
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• RE: [agi] CONSCIOUSNESS AS AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMPUTATION
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: j.k.
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• [agi] Consciousness and Novamente
  • From: Mike Tintner
• [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Jiri Jelinek
• RE: [agi] CONSCIOUSNESS AS AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMPUTATION
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Mike Tintner
• [agi] Ptolemy and Computing
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Stephen Reed
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] modus ponens
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] modus ponens
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re : [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Bruno Frandemiche
• RE: [agi] CONSCIOUSNESS AS AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMPUTATION
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Stephen Reed
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] CONSCIOUSNESS AS AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMPUTATION
  • From: John G. Rose
• Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• RE: Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• Re: [agi] OpenCog's logic compared to FOL?
  • From: Stephen Reed
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: Steve Richfield
• [agi] teme-machines
  • From: David Hart
• RE: [agi] CONSCIOUSNESS AS AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMPUTATION
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] teme-machines
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: Panu Horsmalahti
• Re: Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: Steve Richfield
• RE: Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: Bob Mottram
• RE: [agi] CONSCIOUSNESS AS AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMPUTATION
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• [Humour of some sort] Re: Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: Are rocks conscious? (was RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?)
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: Jim Bromer
• RE: [agi] Did this message get completely lost?
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Neurons
  • From: Steve Richfield
• RE: [agi] CONSCIOUSNESS AS AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMPUTATION
  • From: Ed Porter
• [agi] Paradigm Shifting regarding Consciousness
  • From: Steve Richfield
• [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• RE: [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: Ed Porter
• RE: [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• RE: [agi] teme-machines
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: Steve Richfield
• [agi] So the question is..
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Reverse Engineering The Brain
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• [agi] Forget talk to the animals. Talk directly to their cells.
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• [agi] Developmental Models of Intelligence
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Stephen Reed
• AW: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Dr. Matthias Heger
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Bob Mottram
• AW: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Dr. Matthias Heger
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: A. T. Murray
• RE: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Gary Miller
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• RE: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Derek Zahn
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: John G. Rose
• AW: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: Dr. Matthias Heger
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• RE: [agi] Consciousness vs. Intelligence
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• RE: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: A. T. Murray
• RE: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Paradigm Shifting regarding Consciousness
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• RE: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Ricky Loynd
• Re: [agi] Ideological Interactions Need to be Studied
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• [agi] Who here is located in the Seattle area?
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Who here is located in the Seattle area?
  • From: A. T. Murray
• Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• [agi] Plant Neurobiology
  • From: Mike Tintner
• [agi] Nirvana
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Mark Waser
• [agi] Info Tech
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• [agi] Re: Info Tech
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Jiri Jelinek
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Cognitive Science 'unusable' for AGI [WAS Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• [agi] How the brain separates audio signals from noise
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• [agi] IBM, Los Alamos scientists claim fastest computer
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] IBM, Los Alamos scientists claim fastest computer
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Jey Kottalam
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: Cognitive Science 'unusable' for AGI [WAS Re: [agi] Pearls Before Swine...]
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] IBM, Los Alamos scientists claim fastest computer
  • From: Brad Paulsen
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] IBM, Los Alamos scientists claim fastest computer
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] IBM, Los Alamos scientists claim fastest computer
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• RE: [agi] IBM, Los Alamos scientists claim fastest computer
  • From: Derek Zahn
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: Steve Richfield
• RE: [agi] IBM, Los Alamos scientists claim fastest computer
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Jiri Jelinek
• Re: [agi] IBM, Los Alamos scientists claim fastest computer
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Plant Neurobiology
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Jiri Jelinek
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] IBM, Los Alamos scientists claim fastest computer
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] More brain scanning and language
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: J Storrs Hall, PhD
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Nirvana
  • From: Matt Mahoney