Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition.
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition.
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition.
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition.
  • From: Eric Burton
• Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition.
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition.
  • From: Eric Burton
• [agi] Second Life & the Gaza Conflict
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Second Life & the Gaza Conflict
  • From: BillK
• [agi] Direct communication between minds
  • From: Lukasz Stafiniak
• Re: [agi] Second Life & the Gaza Conflict
  • From: Eric Burton
• Re: [agi] Direct communication between minds
  • From: Eric Burton
• [agi] Epineuronal programming
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Direct communication between minds
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] Direct communication between minds
  • From: Lukasz Stafiniak
• Re: [agi] Direct communication between minds
  • From: Lukasz Stafiniak
• [agi] 2 D holographic wavelet interference opponent processing
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming
  • From: Abram Demski
• [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway...PS
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• [agi] The Self
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Mike Tintner
• RE: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Eric Burton
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• RE: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Ronald C Blue
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Eric Burton
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Harry Chesley
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Harry Chesley
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Harry Chesley
• RE: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Ronald C Blue
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Ed Porter
• RE: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Eric Burton
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Nathan Cook
• [agi] Looking Into Your Mind
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Harry Chesley
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Lukasz Stafiniak
• [agi] Fuzzy Logic in a General Artificial Intelligent Opponent Processing machine.
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Nathan Cook
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] Fuzzy Logic in a General Artificial Intelligent Opponent Processing machine.
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Fuzzy Logic in a General Artificial Intelligent Opponent Processing machine.
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Fuzzy Logic in a General Artificial Intelligent Opponent Processing machine.
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• RE: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Benjamin Johnston
• Free Association, Creativity and AGI (was RE: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.)
  • From: Benjamin Johnston
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] time-sensitive issue: voting members sought to participate in upcoming election for H+ (World Transhumanist Association)
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Linas Vepstas
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• [agi] Identity in an Ouchi illusion...
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Russell Wallace
• [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• RE: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• RE: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product
  • From: Lukasz Kaiser
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Benjamin Johnston
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Philip Hunt
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Philip Hunt
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It?
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• [agi] The fuzzy creative calculator.
  • From: Ronald C Blue
• Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• [agi] just a thought
  • From: Valentina Poletti
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Christopher Carr
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• RE: [agi] just a thought
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• RE: [agi] just a thought
  • From: John G. Rose
• [agi] Encouraging?
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Encouraging?
  • From: Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Encouraging?
  • From: Steve Richfield
• [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Valentina Poletti
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Joshua Cowan
• Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Mike Tintner
• [agi] Synaptic depression enables neuronal gain control
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• [agi] Bayesian surprise attracts human attention
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] Encouraging?
  • From: Kyle Kidd
• Re: [agi] Bayesian surprise attracts human attention
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Bayesian surprise attracts human attention
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: David Clark
• [agi] Paper: Voodoo Correlations in Social Neuroscience
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Paper: Voodoo Correlations in Social Neuroscience
  • From: Nathan Cook
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Medhat Riad
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: David Clark
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Medhat Riad
• Re: [agi] just a thought
  • From: Kyle Kidd
• Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: marco guardigli
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Jan Klauck
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Jim Bromer
• RE: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Jan Klauck
• [agi] Course list for 2009 AGI Summer School updated
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• [agi] What compatible compilers are actively being developed?
  • From: Charles Hixson
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Jan Klauck
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: BillK
• Re: [agi] What compatible compilers are actively being developed?
  • From: Charles Hixson
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Jan Klauck
• [agi] Call for papers: Models@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Jean-paul Van Belle
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: BillK
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: BillK
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Jan Klauck
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Bob Mottram
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Jan Klauck
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: Jan Klauck
• Re: Future Impact of AGI [WAS Re: [agi] just a thought]
  • From: BillK
• [agi] AI and war: radio programme
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Eric Burton
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Mark Horvath
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Mark Horvath
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Robert Swaine
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Robert Swaine
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• RE: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: John G. Rose
• [agi] Perhaps we should include this in OpenCogPrime's codebase...
  • From: Jeremy Zucker
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• [agi] Creative idea sourcing
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Creative idea sourcing
  • From: Robert Swaine
• [agi] updates
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] Perhaps we should include this in OpenCogPrime's codebase...
  • From: Joseph Henry
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Dr. Heger
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Dr. Heger
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Charles Hixson
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Mark Horvath
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Dr. Heger
• [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• RE: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: John G. Rose
• Probabilistic Knowledge Representations [WAS Re: [agi] probability paradox]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: Probabilistic Knowledge Representations [WAS Re: [agi] probability paradox]
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Robert Swaine
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Dr. Matthias Heger
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: Probabilistic Knowledge Representations [WAS Re: [agi] probability paradox]
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Dr. Matthias Heger
• [agi] New Technology Question
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: Probabilistic Knowledge Representations [WAS Re: [agi] probability paradox]
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: Probabilistic Knowledge Representations [WAS Re: [agi] probability paradox]
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• [agi] RE: [OpenCog] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: Probabilistic Knowledge Representations [WAS Re: [agi] probability paradox]
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Dr. Matthias Heger
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Chuck Esterbrook
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Mark Horvath
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Mark Horvath
• RE: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] New Technology Question
  • From: Marco Guardigli
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• RE: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Colin Hales
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• [agi] Another Day, Another Engram Experiment
  • From: Mike Tintner
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Morris F. Johnson
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: BillK
• [agi] Interesting article about optimism in mainstream AI community
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• [agi] The PCST is now online - a scientifically sound, objective test for consciousness
  • From: Colin Hales
• [agi] The PCST is now online - a scientifically sound, objective test for consciousness
  • From: Colin Hales
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] Temporal, spatial and intensional inference on large knowledge bases
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Temporal, spatial and intensional inference on large knowledge bases
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Temporal, spatial and intensional inference on large knowledge bases
  • From: Robert Swaine
• [agi] Whacky AGI fiction (by me)
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] Slightly less whacky AGI fiction
  • From: Eliezer Yudkowsky
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Whacky AGI fiction (by me)
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: William Pearson
• RE: [agi] RE: [OpenCog] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Eugene Surowitz
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Slightly less whacky AGI fiction
  • From: Eric Burton
• Re: [agi] Slightly less whacky AGI fiction
  • From: Eric Burton
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Moshe Looks
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] Slightly less whacky AGI fiction
  • From: Charles Hixson
• RE: [agi] Whacky AGI fiction (by me)
  • From: John G. Rose
• RE: [agi] Whacky AGI fiction (by me)
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Whacky AGI fiction (by me)
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] [pure math question]
  • From: Matthew Henderson
• Re: [agi] [pure math question]
  • From: Robert Swaine
• RE: [agi] [pure math question]
  • From: Ed Porter
• RE: [agi] RE: [OpenCog] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] [pure math question]
  • From: Marco Guardigli
• RE: [agi] Whacky AGI fiction (by me)
  • From: John G. Rose
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] Sketch of a general theory of general intelligence, with application to OpenCog
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] [pure math question]
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] [pure math question]
  • From: Russell Wallace
• [agi] A few good volunteers needed for AGI-09
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] [pure math question]
  • From: Valentina Poletti
• [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Reine Gill
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Joseph Henry
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Joseph Henry
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• [agi] Confusions, Traps and Fallacies About the Future of AGI
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Joseph Henry
• Re: [agi] [pure math question]
  • From: Matthew Henderson
• Re: [agi] [pure math question]
  • From: Marco Guardigli
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Steve Richfield
• [agi] OT Scratch Wiki
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] OT Scratch Wiki
  • From: Marco Guardigli
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Daniel Allen
• Re: [agi] OT Scratch Wiki
  • From: Philip Hunt
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: rg
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: rg
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: rg
• Re: [agi] A few good volunteers needed for AGI-09
  • From: Matthew Henderson
• [agi] proposal: combining PZ and PLN
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Harry Chesley
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Reine Gill
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Reine Gill
• [agi] Re: A few good volunteers needed for AGI-09
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] proposal: combining PZ and PLN
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] proposal: combining PZ and PLN
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] proposal: combining PZ and PLN
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] HYCAS 2009 @ IJCAI-09: Hybrid Control of Autonomous Systems
  • From: Ronald C. Blue
• Re: [agi] proposal: combining PZ and PLN
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages, or not
  • From: CMoel888
• Re: [agi] proposal: combining PZ and PLN
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages, or not
  • From: Colin Hales
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Joseph Henry
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Samantha Atkins
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Samantha Atkins
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Samantha Atkins
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Samantha Atkins
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Programming languages, or not
  • From: Mike Archbold
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: wannabe
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] proposal: combining PZ and PLN
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] proposal: combining PZ and PLN
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin)
• Re: [agi] proposal: combining PZ and PLN
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: rg
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: rg
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• RE: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Joseph Henry
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Programming languages, or not
  • From: CMoel888
• RE: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• RE: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Bob Mottram
• RE: [agi] new school to prepare scientists for an era when machines become cleverer than people
  • From: Ed Porter
• [agi] Reverse Turing test
  • From: Harry Chesley
• Re: [agi] Reverse Turing test
  • From: Robert Swaine
• [agi] inference control
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: David Clark
• Re: [agi] Reverse Turing test
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Jean-paul Van Belle
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Vladimir Nesov
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Mark Waser
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Harry Chesley
• [agi] Programming Languages: Please put issues into separate threads
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: David Clark
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: David Clark
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Reine Gill
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Reine Gill
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Richard Loosemore
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• [agi] Project to reverse engineering the brain using donated pc time over the web
  • From: Ed Porter
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Abram Demski
• Re: [agi] inference control
  • From: Lukasz Stafiniak
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Improving resilience to botnetting Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: William Pearson
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Russell Wallace
• Re: [agi] blackboard idea
  • From: Ben Goertzel
• [agi] [Fwd: The IJCAI-09 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Space]
  • From: Jan Klauck
• Re: [agi] What can we do to prepare II
  • From: Steve Richfield
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] inference control
  • From: YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤)
• Re: [agi] Programming languages: once more, with feeling
  • From: Harshad RJ
• Re: [agi] probability paradox
  • From: Pei Wang
• Re: [agi] Project to reverse engineering the brain using donated pc time over the web
  • From: Richard Loosemore