Re: [[ Just to check ]]

[Claudio Jeker <jeker@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:21:43PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> Hi people,
> 
> 	I'm trying to check some informations:
> 
> 	On the qmail-ldap.org website we can read in
> the middle of the page "What qmail-ldap is: (Updated
> 20040701)" and just a little bit down the information
> point to patch "20040801". The second is the right,
> isn't it?
> 

Yes. The 20040801 is currently the latest and greates and AFAIK there are
no current issues with this patch.

> 	The second information is about extra patches,
> I remember of some messages and some "patches" posted.
> The 20040801 release also include these patches?
> Because I have some troubles with my mail server and
> I'm afraid that I lost "some" patch.
> 

All patches that where bug-fixes are added but have a look at the
QLDAPNEWS file for more info what went in and what not.

> 	At last but not least, a few days ago I saw
> a message about "spamthrottle". qmail-ldap is the
> best "patch" for qmail that I know, and as I understand
> throttle is not included, any reasons? It is not good?
> Because in the site[1] there is a patch for qmail-ldap.
> :o)
> 

It seems as if there is a patch for qmail-ldap on the spamthrottle site.
I just glimpsed at the code and I'm not sure if I will directly import it.
It's quite a big patch for just a sleep() before DATA.
Also I doubt it will work corretly in clustered setups but as I said I
just glimpsed at the code.

There are plans to limit the overall throughput of mails via pbs but I'm
currently busy.

-- 
:wq Claudio