Re: Desktop apps interoperability

[Rogelio Serrano <rogelio.serrano@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Apr 1, 2005 5:05 AM, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 23:13 +0200, Tom wrote:
> > He does have a point, though - sometimes the application can not be
> > changed. It may be a legacy application and for all I care, those are
> > the ones most in need of a protective cage.
> 

Unchangeable legacy apps should die.
 
> Sure, and at that point, you just confine it as best as you can while
> still allowing whatever functionality you require.  SELinux supports
> that need just fine.  But you don't want to just accept that status quo
> for all applications for all time, which seemed to be Casey's attitude.
> 
[snipped...]

I think everybody agrees that aggressive refactorization of source
code is a good thing. Therefore in an open source environment legacy
apps dont exist.

-- 
Blood is thicker than water... and much tastier
                                           John Davidorff Pell

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.