Re: depinit

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 04:46:03PM -0400, Chris PeBenito wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 18:42 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > despite depinit being a core critical component of linux from
> > scratch, and thence, for some time, in gentoo, he has received
> 
> I'm not sure where you heard this; Gentoo has always used sysvinit.
> Depinit isn't even in the portage tree.
 
  odd.  time to read more carefully:

	  http://mail.lug.lk/lurker/message/20050428.084821.4711d463.en.html

 yep, you're absolutely right - it describes lfs as being similar to
 gentoo in that it's a source-code based distro, and describes _lfs_
 as having 3 startup options - one of them being depinit.

 i'm _sure_ i've also seen one other message about depinit being
 one of the early options for gentoo (a lfs derivative),
 and people going "hurrah" when it was removed in favour
 of sysvinit.

 l.


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.