Re: smaller memory footprint for 'strict' policy - helping gentoo as well

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:10:40AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:

> in there that *my* config totally doesn't need).  I suspect the reason I saw
> such big savings is because some of the stuff in macros/program generates a
> *lot* of $USER_foo_t types unnecessarily (thus the need for more ifdefs to
> suppress that).
> 
> I'll make up a proper patch later this week when I have more time...

 GREAT! the less, the merrier :)



-- 
--
<a href="http://lkcl.net";>http://lkcl.net</a>
--

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.