[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Execmem boolean


Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:

Strict policy likely
shouldn't allow execmod to anything but texrel_shlib_t, and can thus
omit the boolean altogether.

Please don't break strict policy :(

I still have some hope left to be able to run it on my home machine. The level of "strictness"
should be configurable.

We could kill the allow_execmod/allow_execmem booleans,
allow execmod to texrel, allow exemem for X,
Ok.
Should be a boolean allow_X_execmem. Most people don't need execmem for X. (Only nvidia binary drivers)

and then have per app booleans for other things we don't trust
(like Java applets?).





--



--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


This mailing list archive is a service of Copilot Consulting.