[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: file contexts and modularity

To: Karl MacMillan <kmacmillan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: file contexts and modularity
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:52:57 -0400
Cc: gyurdiev@xxxxxxxxxx, "'Janak Desai'" <janak@xxxxxxxxxx>, selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'Daniel J Walsh'" <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200506301448.j5UEmP7f027939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: National Security Agency
References: <200506301448.j5UEmP7f027939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 10:48 -0400, Karl MacMillan wrote:
> I don't remember suggesting their removal - must have been poor wording on my
> part since you both misunderstood.

Actually, on second thought, I think that you were actually questioning
the derived program domains rather than derived file types, e.g.
user_ssh_t vs. staff_ssh_t.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

References:
- RE: file contexts and modularity
  - From: Karl MacMillan

Prev by Date: Re: file contexts and modularity
Next by Date: RE: file contexts and modularity
Previous by thread: RE: file contexts and modularity
Next by thread: Re: file contexts and modularity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

This mailing list archive is a service of Copilot Consulting.