[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] SELinux - canonicalize getxattr() (fwd)

To: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SELinux - canonicalize getxattr() (fwd)
From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:23:25 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, SELinux-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1130439786.18805.322.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0509141014520.7898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1130439786.18805.322.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Stephen Smalley wrote:

> Thoughts?

It may be helpful to have type aliases, but are they truly necessary?  

Seems like a lot of potential problems arise from them, including 
confusing SELinux developers.

Perhaps type aliasing would be better implemented as a higher level policy 
construct?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] SELinux - canonicalize getxattr() (fwd)
  - From: Stephen Smalley

References:
- [PATCH] SELinux - canonicalize getxattr() (fwd)
  - From: James Morris
- Re: [PATCH] SELinux - canonicalize getxattr() (fwd)
  - From: Stephen Smalley

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] SELinux - canonicalize getxattr() (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: [ SEMANAGE ] Enable things for testing, add missing set relay
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] SELinux - canonicalize getxattr() (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] SELinux - canonicalize getxattr() (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

This mailing list archive is a service of Copilot Consulting.